Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per was 278,985 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Kazakhstan, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Kazakhstan stood at 278,985 constant LCU per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 7.4% on the previous year and up 23.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Kazakhstan peaked at 301,280 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 115,327 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1998.
Kazakhstan ranks 91st of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 271,653 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 252,908 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1994 | 199,798 constant LCU per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 1995 | 151,047 constant LCU per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 1996 | 143,495 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1997 | 142,203 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1998 | 115,327 constant LCU per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1999 | 140,007 constant LCU per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 2000 | 135,527 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2001 | 158,702 constant LCU per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 2002 | 163,780 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2003 | 167,383 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2004 | 167,216 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2005 | 179,088 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2006 | 189,834 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2007 | 206,729 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2008 | 193,912 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2009 | 219,508 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2010 | 194,045 constant LCU per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2011 | 245,467 constant LCU per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 2012 | 202,755 constant LCU per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 2013 | 225,464 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2014 | 228,395 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2015 | 236,389 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2016 | 249,154 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2017 | 257,127 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2018 | 266,898 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2019 | 266,631 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2020 | 282,362 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2021 | 276,150 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2022 | 301,280 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2023 | 278,985 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.4% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 278,985 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 302,333 constant LCU per square kilometre, 92% of the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 278,985 constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 67,376 constant LCU per square kilometre, 4.1× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 177,055 constant LCU per square kilometre | 115,327 constant LCU per square kilometre | 271,653 constant LCU per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 178,168 constant LCU per square kilometre | 135,527 constant LCU per square kilometre | 219,508 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 237,232 constant LCU per square kilometre | 194,045 constant LCU per square kilometre | 266,898 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 284,694 constant LCU per square kilometre | 276,150 constant LCU per square kilometre | 301,280 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 88 Malaysia 305,564 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 89 Dominica 302,333 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 90 Sierra Leone 288,624 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 92 Tonga 272,601 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 93 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 271,359 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 94 Honduras 265,970 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Kazakhstan
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.35 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.38 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 468.52 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0015 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 22.48 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled -916.40 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -143.78 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit -0.003 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita -43.97 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 44.23 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Kazakhstan?
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Kazakhstan was 278,985 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 301,280 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 115,327 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1998.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
- Kazakhstan ranks 91st out of 194 countries with data for 2023.
- Is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.