Kazakhstan vs Tonga: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Kazakhstan
278,985 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
272,601 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
91st
Tonga rank
92nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Tonga
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197519992023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 278,985 constant LCU per square kilometre against 272,601 constant LCU per square kilometre in Tonga, a difference of 6,384 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 91st and Tonga ranks 92nd of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Tonga Difference Ahead
1990s 177,055 constant LCU per square kilometre 237,747 constant LCU per square kilometre 60,692 constant LCU per square kilometre Tonga
2000s 178,168 constant LCU per square kilometre 228,288 constant LCU per square kilometre 50,120 constant LCU per square kilometre Tonga
2010s 237,232 constant LCU per square kilometre 238,620 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,388 constant LCU per square kilometre Tonga
2020s 284,694 constant LCU per square kilometre 257,294 constant LCU per square kilometre 27,400 constant LCU per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Kazakhstan or Tonga?
Kazakhstan, at 278,985 constant LCU per square kilometre against 272,601 constant LCU per square kilometre in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Kazakhstan and Tonga?
6,384 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Tonga?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Tonga rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Kazakhstan ranks 91st and Tonga ranks 92nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Tonga: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/tonga/">Kazakhstan vs Tonga: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.