Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Argentina

Argentina: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per was 14,266 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
14,266 constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
down 23.4%
World rank
175th
of 194 countries
All-time high
20,598 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2019
All-time low
7,450 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1970
Years of data
59
1965–2023

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Argentina, 1965–2023

05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196519942023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Argentina is 14,266 constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023.

The figure is down 23.4% on the previous year and down 21.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Argentina peaked at 20,598 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2019 and was at its lowest, 7,450 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1970.

Argentina ranks 175th of 194 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 59 years of available data.

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Argentina, year by year

Annual values for Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina, 1965 to 2023.
Year constant LCU per square kilometre Change
1965 7,936 constant LCU per square kilometre
1966 8,009 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.9%
1967 8,213 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.5%
1968 7,863 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.3%
1969 8,213 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.4%
1970 7,450 constant LCU per square kilometre -9.3%
1971 7,567 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.6%
1972 7,712 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.9%
1973 8,539 constant LCU per square kilometre +10.7%
1974 8,772 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.7%
1975 8,531 constant LCU per square kilometre -2.7%
1976 8,933 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.7%
1977 9,152 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.4%
1978 9,407 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.8%
1979 9,676 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.9%
1980 9,095 constant LCU per square kilometre -6.0%
1981 9,413 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.5%
1982 10,116 constant LCU per square kilometre +7.5%
1983 10,322 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.0%
1984 10,359 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.4%
1985 10,183 constant LCU per square kilometre -1.7%
1986 10,201 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.2%
1987 9,923 constant LCU per square kilometre -2.7%
1988 10,704 constant LCU per square kilometre +7.9%
1989 9,824 constant LCU per square kilometre -8.2%
1990 10,657 constant LCU per square kilometre +8.5%
1991 11,093 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.1%
1992 11,114 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.2%
1993 11,384 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.4%
1994 12,212 constant LCU per square kilometre +7.3%
1995 12,890 constant LCU per square kilometre +5.6%
1996 12,776 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.9%
1997 12,853 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.6%
1998 13,920 constant LCU per square kilometre +8.3%
1999 14,250 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.4%
2000 13,998 constant LCU per square kilometre -1.8%
2001 14,207 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.5%
2002 13,831 constant LCU per square kilometre -2.7%
2003 14,767 constant LCU per square kilometre +6.8%
2004 14,824 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.4%
2005 17,609 constant LCU per square kilometre +18.8%
2006 17,516 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.5%
2007 19,012 constant LCU per square kilometre +8.5%
2008 18,596 constant LCU per square kilometre -2.2%
2009 13,742 constant LCU per square kilometre -26.1%
2010 19,174 constant LCU per square kilometre +39.5%
2011 18,708 constant LCU per square kilometre -2.4%
2012 16,299 constant LCU per square kilometre -12.9%
2013 18,170 constant LCU per square kilometre +11.5%
2014 18,734 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.1%
2015 20,147 constant LCU per square kilometre +7.5%
2016 19,197 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.7%
2017 19,858 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.4%
2018 16,962 constant LCU per square kilometre -14.6%
2019 20,598 constant LCU per square kilometre +21.4%
2020 19,051 constant LCU per square kilometre -7.5%
2021 19,406 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.9%
2022 18,613 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.1%
2023 14,266 constant LCU per square kilometre -23.4%

Argentina compared with similar countries

  • Argentina's 14,266 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 302,333 constant LCU per square kilometre, 5% of the median. (57 countries reporting)
  • Argentina's 14,266 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 174,468 constant LCU per square kilometre, 8% of the median. (36 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Argentina changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2010 +39.5% 13,742 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,174 constant LCU per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 8,047 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,863 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,213 constant LCU per square kilometre 5
1970s 8,574 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,450 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,676 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1980s 10,014 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,095 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,704 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1990s 12,315 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,657 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,250 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2000s 15,810 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,742 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,012 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2010s 18,785 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,299 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,598 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2020s 17,834 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,266 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,406 constant LCU per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Argentina

  1. 172 Montenegro 15,388 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  2. 173 Liberia 14,992 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  3. 174 Tajikistan 14,542 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  4. 176 Namibia 13,279 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  5. 177 Kuwait 12,221 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  6. 178 Aruba 11,372 constant LCU per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 195 places →

More economy & growth data for Argentina

All data for Argentina →

Frequently asked questions

What is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Argentina?
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Argentina was 14,266 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Argentina?
The highest recorded value was 20,598 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2019.
What is the lowest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Argentina?
The lowest recorded value was 7,450 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1970.
How does Argentina rank for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Argentina ranks 175th out of 194 countries with data for 2023.
Is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Argentina?
Over the last ten years it is down 21.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Argentina data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Argentina. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/">Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Argentina</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.