Argentina vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Argentina
14,266 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
13,279 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
175th
Namibia rank
176th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Argentina
  • Namibia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196519942023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 14,266 constant LCU per square kilometre against 13,279 constant LCU per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 987 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 175th and Namibia ranks 176th of 194 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 10,014 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,746 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,268 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 12,315 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,494 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,821 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 15,810 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,054 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,756 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 18,785 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,149 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,635 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 17,834 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,440 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,394 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Argentina or Namibia?
Argentina, at 14,266 constant LCU per square kilometre against 13,279 constant LCU per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Argentina and Namibia?
987 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Namibia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Namibia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Argentina ranks 175th and Namibia ranks 176th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/namibia/">Argentina vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.