Statizoid

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Uganda

Uganda: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion was 0.0% in 2021. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2021)
0.0%
World rank
96th
of 208 countries
All-time high
0.8%
in 1970
All-time low
0.0%
in 1982
Years of data
52
1970–2021

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Uganda, 1970–2021

00.20.40.60.8197019952021

Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Measured in % of GNI.

Analysis

In 2021, adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Uganda stood at 0.0%. That is the lowest value across all 52 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Uganda peaked at 0.8% in 1970 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 1982.

Uganda ranks 96th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Uganda, year by year

Year % of GNI Change
1970 0.8% —
1971 0.4% -47.3%
1972 0.3% -21.5%
1973 0.6% +77.5%
1974 0.5% -22.3%
1975 0.1% -75.0%
1976 0.1% -0.1%
1977 0.1% -56.9%
1978 0.0% -49.9%
1979 0.0% -37.3%
1980 0.0% +81.9%
1981 0.0% -38.3%
1982 0.0% -100.0%
1983 0.0% —
1984 0.0% —
1985 0.0% —
1986 0.0% —
1987 0.0% —
1988 0.0% —
1989 0.0% —
1990 0.0% —
1991 0.0% —
1992 0.0% —
1993 0.0% —
1994 0.0% —
1995 0.0% —
1996 0.0% —
1997 0.0% —
1998 0.0% —
1999 0.0% -55.1%
2000 0.0% +1712.2%
2001 0.0% -100.0%
2002 0.0% —
2003 0.0% -43.1%
2004 0.0% +22758.5%
2005 0.0% +62.5%
2006 0.1% +141.3%
2007 0.1% -5.8%
2008 0.1% -0.7%
2009 0.0% -100.0%
2010 0.0% +4594.3%
2011 0.0% -74.9%
2012 0.0% +145.7%
2013 0.1% +26349.6%
2014 0.1% -26.8%
2015 0.1% -25.1%
2016 0.1% +42.3%
2017 0.0% -53.5%
2018 0.0% -100.0%
2019 0.0% —
2020 0.0% —
2021 0.0% —

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0.3% 0.0% 0.8% 10
1980s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 10
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 10
2020s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2

Countries ranked near Uganda

  1. 93 Malawi 0.0% compare
  2. 94 Korea 0.0% compare
  3. 95 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0.0% compare
  4. 96 Afghanistan 0.0% compare
  5. 96 American Samoa 0.0%
  6. 96 Angola 0.0%
  7. 96 Antigua and Barbuda 0.0%
  8. 96 Aruba 0.0%
  9. 96 Austria 0.0% compare
  10. 96 Bahamas 0.0%
  11. 96 Bahrain 0.0%
  12. 96 Bangladesh 0.0%
  13. 96 Barbados 0.0%
  14. 96 Belarus 0.0%
  15. 96 Belgium 0.0% compare
  16. 96 Belize 0.0% compare
  17. 96 Benin 0.0% compare
  18. 96 Bermuda 0.0%
  19. 96 Brunei Darussalam 0.0%
  20. 96 Burundi 0.0% compare
  21. 96 Cape Verde 0.0%
  22. 96 Cambodia 0.0% compare
  23. 96 Cameroon 0.0% compare
  24. 96 Cayman Islands 0.0%
  25. 96 Chad 0.0% compare
  26. 96 Comoros 0.0%
  27. 96 Congo 0.0% compare
  28. 96 Costa Rica 0.0% compare
  29. 96 Croatia 0.0% compare
  30. 96 Curaçao 0.0%
  31. 96 Czechia 0.0% compare
  32. 96 Denmark 0.0% compare
  33. 96 Djibouti 0.0%
  34. 96 Dominica 0.0%
  35. 96 Ecuador 0.0% compare
  36. 96 Egypt 0.0% compare
  37. 96 El Salvador 0.0% compare
  38. 96 Equatorial Guinea 0.0% compare
  39. 96 Estonia 0.0%
  40. 96 Eswatini 0.0% compare
  41. 96 Faroe Islands 0.0%
  42. 96 France 0.0% compare
  43. 96 French Polynesia 0.0%
  44. 96 Gambia 0.0%
  45. 96 Germany 0.0% compare
  46. 96 Grenada 0.0%
  47. 96 Guinea 0.0% compare
  48. 96 Guinea-Bissau 0.0%
  49. 96 Haiti 0.0% compare
  50. 96 Hong Kong, China 0.0% compare
  51. 96 Hungary 0.0% compare
  52. 96 Iceland 0.0%
  53. 96 Iraq 0.0% compare
  54. 96 Isle of Man 0.0%
  55. 96 Israel 0.0% compare
  56. 96 Italy 0.0% compare
  57. 96 Jamaica 0.0% compare
  58. 96 Jordan 0.0% compare
  59. 96 Kiribati 0.0%
  60. 96 Kuwait 0.0%
  61. 96 Latvia 0.0%
  62. 96 Lebanon 0.0%
  63. 96 Lesotho 0.0%
  64. 96 Libya 0.0%
  65. 96 Liechtenstein 0.0%
  66. 96 Lithuania 0.0%
  67. 96 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
  68. 96 Macau, China 0.0%
  69. 96 Madagascar 0.0% compare
  70. 96 Malaysia 0.0% compare
  71. 96 Maldives 0.0%
  72. 96 Malta 0.0%
  73. 96 Marshall Islands 0.0%
  74. 96 Mauritius 0.0%
  75. 96 Micronesia, Federated States of 0.0%
  76. 96 Republic of Moldova 0.0%
  77. 96 Naoero 0.0%
  78. 96 Nepal 0.0% compare
  79. 96 Netherlands 0.0% compare
  80. 96 North Macedonia 0.0% compare
  81. 96 Norway 0.0% compare
  82. 96 Oman 0.0% compare
  83. 96 Palau 0.0%
  84. 96 Paraguay 0.0%
  85. 96 Puerto Rico 0.0%
  86. 96 Qatar 0.0%
  87. 96 Rwanda 0.0% compare
  88. 96 Samoa 0.0%
  89. 96 Sao Tome and Principe 0.0%
  90. 96 Seychelles 0.0%
  91. 96 Singapore 0.0%
  92. 96 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 0.0%
  93. 96 Slovenia 0.0%
  94. 96 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
  95. 96 Somalia 0.0%
  96. 96 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
  97. 96 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.0%
  98. 96 Saint Lucia 0.0%
  99. 96 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0%
  100. 96 Suriname 0.0% compare
  101. 96 Switzerland 0.0% compare
  102. 96 Syrian Arab Republic 0.0% compare
  103. 96 Thailand 0.0% compare
  104. 96 Timor-Leste 0.0%
  105. 96 Tonga 0.0%
  106. 96 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0%
  107. 96 Tunisia 0.0% compare
  108. 96 Turkmenistan 0.0%
  109. 96 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0%
  110. 96 Tuvalu 0.0%
  111. 96 United Arab Emirates 0.0%
  112. 96 Vanuatu 0.0%
  113. 96 Palestine, State of 0.0%
  114. 96 Yemen 0.0%
  115. 96 Channel Islands 0.0%

See the full ranking of 256 places →

More economy & growth data for Uganda

All data for Uganda →

Frequently asked questions

What is adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Uganda?
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Uganda was 0.0% in 2021, according to Staff estimates, World Bank (WB).
What is the highest adjusted savings: mineral depletion recorded in Uganda?
The highest recorded value was 0.8% in 1970.
What is the lowest adjusted savings: mineral depletion recorded in Uganda?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 1982.
How does Uganda rank for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Uganda ranks 96th out of 208 countries with data for 2021.
Is adjusted savings: mineral depletion rising or falling in Uganda?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Uganda data come from?
The figures come from Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as part of Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Uganda. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-percent-of-gni/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-percent-of-gni/uganda/">Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Uganda</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
256 places, 11,019 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.