Statizoid

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Croatia

Croatia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion was 0.0% in 2021. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2021)
0.0%
World rank
96th
of 208 countries
All-time high
0.0%
in 2018
All-time low
0.0%
in 1996
Years of data
27
1995–2021

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Croatia, 1995–2021

00001995200820211995: 0 % of GNI1996: 0 % of GNI1997: 0 % of GNI1998: 0 % of GNI1999: 0 % of GNI2000: 0 % of GNI2001: 0 % of GNI2002: 0 % of GNI2003: 0 % of GNI2004: 0 % of GNI2005: 0 % of GNI2006: 0 % of GNI2007: 0 % of GNI2008: 0 % of GNI2009: 0 % of GNI2010: 0 % of GNI2011: 0 % of GNI2012: 0 % of GNI2013: 0 % of GNI2014: 0 % of GNI2015: 0 % of GNI2016: 0 % of GNI2017: 0 % of GNI2018: 0 % of GNI2019: 0 % of GNI2020: 0 % of GNI2021: 0 % of GNI

Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Measured in % of GNI.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Croatia is 0.0%, measured in 2021. That is the lowest value across all 27 years on record.

The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Croatia peaked at 0.0% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 1996.

Croatia ranks 96th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Croatia, year by year

Year % of GNI Change
1995 0.0% —
1996 0.0% -100.0%
1997 0.0% —
1998 0.0% —
1999 0.0% —
2000 0.0% —
2001 0.0% —
2002 0.0% —
2003 0.0% —
2004 0.0% —
2005 0.0% —
2006 0.0% —
2007 0.0% —
2008 0.0% —
2009 0.0% —
2010 0.0% +190.8%
2011 0.0% +313.7%
2012 0.0% +59.5%
2013 0.0% +17.8%
2014 0.0% +2.5%
2015 0.0% +39.6%
2016 0.0% -15.4%
2017 0.0% +61.2%
2018 0.0% +74.5%
2019 0.0% -100.0%
2020 0.0% —
2021 0.0% —

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10
2020s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2

Countries ranked near Croatia

  1. 93 Malawi 0.0% compare
  2. 94 Korea 0.0% compare
  3. 95 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0.0% compare
  4. 96 Afghanistan 0.0% compare
  5. 96 American Samoa 0.0%
  6. 96 Angola 0.0%
  7. 96 Antigua and Barbuda 0.0%
  8. 96 Aruba 0.0%
  9. 96 Austria 0.0% compare
  10. 96 Bahamas 0.0%
  11. 96 Bahrain 0.0%
  12. 96 Bangladesh 0.0%
  13. 96 Barbados 0.0%
  14. 96 Belarus 0.0%
  15. 96 Belgium 0.0% compare
  16. 96 Belize 0.0% compare
  17. 96 Benin 0.0% compare
  18. 96 Bermuda 0.0%
  19. 96 Brunei Darussalam 0.0%
  20. 96 Burundi 0.0% compare
  21. 96 Cape Verde 0.0%
  22. 96 Cambodia 0.0% compare
  23. 96 Cameroon 0.0% compare
  24. 96 Cayman Islands 0.0%
  25. 96 Chad 0.0% compare
  26. 96 Comoros 0.0%
  27. 96 Congo 0.0% compare
  28. 96 Costa Rica 0.0% compare
  29. 96 Curaçao 0.0%
  30. 96 Czechia 0.0% compare
  31. 96 Denmark 0.0% compare
  32. 96 Djibouti 0.0%
  33. 96 Dominica 0.0%
  34. 96 Ecuador 0.0% compare
  35. 96 Egypt 0.0% compare
  36. 96 El Salvador 0.0% compare
  37. 96 Equatorial Guinea 0.0% compare
  38. 96 Estonia 0.0%
  39. 96 Eswatini 0.0% compare
  40. 96 Faroe Islands 0.0%
  41. 96 France 0.0% compare
  42. 96 French Polynesia 0.0%
  43. 96 Gambia 0.0%
  44. 96 Germany 0.0% compare
  45. 96 Grenada 0.0%
  46. 96 Guinea 0.0% compare
  47. 96 Guinea-Bissau 0.0%
  48. 96 Haiti 0.0% compare
  49. 96 Hong Kong, China 0.0% compare
  50. 96 Hungary 0.0% compare
  51. 96 Iceland 0.0%
  52. 96 Iraq 0.0% compare
  53. 96 Isle of Man 0.0%
  54. 96 Israel 0.0% compare
  55. 96 Italy 0.0% compare
  56. 96 Jamaica 0.0% compare
  57. 96 Jordan 0.0% compare
  58. 96 Kiribati 0.0%
  59. 96 Kuwait 0.0%
  60. 96 Latvia 0.0%
  61. 96 Lebanon 0.0%
  62. 96 Lesotho 0.0%
  63. 96 Libya 0.0%
  64. 96 Liechtenstein 0.0%
  65. 96 Lithuania 0.0%
  66. 96 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
  67. 96 Macau, China 0.0%
  68. 96 Madagascar 0.0% compare
  69. 96 Malaysia 0.0% compare
  70. 96 Maldives 0.0%
  71. 96 Malta 0.0%
  72. 96 Marshall Islands 0.0%
  73. 96 Mauritius 0.0%
  74. 96 Micronesia, Federated States of 0.0%
  75. 96 Republic of Moldova 0.0%
  76. 96 Naoero 0.0%
  77. 96 Nepal 0.0% compare
  78. 96 Netherlands 0.0% compare
  79. 96 North Macedonia 0.0% compare
  80. 96 Norway 0.0% compare
  81. 96 Oman 0.0% compare
  82. 96 Palau 0.0%
  83. 96 Paraguay 0.0%
  84. 96 Puerto Rico 0.0%
  85. 96 Qatar 0.0%
  86. 96 Rwanda 0.0% compare
  87. 96 Samoa 0.0%
  88. 96 Sao Tome and Principe 0.0%
  89. 96 Seychelles 0.0%
  90. 96 Singapore 0.0%
  91. 96 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 0.0%
  92. 96 Slovenia 0.0%
  93. 96 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
  94. 96 Somalia 0.0%
  95. 96 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
  96. 96 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.0%
  97. 96 Saint Lucia 0.0%
  98. 96 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0%
  99. 96 Suriname 0.0% compare
  100. 96 Switzerland 0.0% compare
  101. 96 Syrian Arab Republic 0.0% compare
  102. 96 Thailand 0.0% compare
  103. 96 Timor-Leste 0.0%
  104. 96 Tonga 0.0%
  105. 96 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0%
  106. 96 Tunisia 0.0% compare
  107. 96 Turkmenistan 0.0%
  108. 96 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0%
  109. 96 Tuvalu 0.0%
  110. 96 Uganda 0.0% compare
  111. 96 United Arab Emirates 0.0%
  112. 96 Vanuatu 0.0%
  113. 96 Palestine, State of 0.0%
  114. 96 Yemen 0.0%
  115. 96 Channel Islands 0.0%

See the full ranking of 256 places →

More economy & growth data for Croatia

All data for Croatia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Croatia?
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Croatia was 0.0% in 2021, according to Staff estimates, World Bank (WB).
What is the highest adjusted savings: mineral depletion recorded in Croatia?
The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 2018.
What is the lowest adjusted savings: mineral depletion recorded in Croatia?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 1996.
How does Croatia rank for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Croatia ranks 96th out of 208 countries with data for 2021.
Is adjusted savings: mineral depletion rising or falling in Croatia?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Croatia data come from?
The figures come from Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as part of Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Croatia. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-percent-of-gni/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-percent-of-gni/croatia/">Adjusted savings: mineral depletion in Croatia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
256 places, 11,019 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.