Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Finland
Finland: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square was 489.01 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Finland, 1970–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Finland recorded 489.01 current US$ per square kilometre for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in 2021.
The figure is up 535.3% on the previous year and down 46.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Finland peaked at 1,132 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.6535 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2001.
That places Finland 65th out of 216 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Finland, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 71.04 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 43.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.1% |
| 1972 | 51.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 1973 | 142.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +177.9% |
| 1974 | 181.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 1975 | 60.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.6% |
| 1976 | 80.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 1977 | 67.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 1978 | 44.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.0% |
| 1979 | 93.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +110.3% |
| 1980 | 117.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 1981 | 59.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.3% |
| 1982 | 38.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.1% |
| 1983 | 46.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1984 | 25.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.9% |
| 1985 | 25.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1986 | 14.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.6% |
| 1987 | 24.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.0% |
| 1988 | 91.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +271.0% |
| 1989 | 253.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +175.6% |
| 1990 | 100.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.2% |
| 1991 | 130.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 1992 | 86.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.5% |
| 1993 | 35.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.0% |
| 1994 | 42.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1995 | 50.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 1996 | 43.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 1997 | 81.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.8% |
| 1998 | 44.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.0% |
| 1999 | 63.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 2000 | 55.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2001 | 0.6535 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.8% |
| 2002 | 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +5198.4% |
| 2003 | 51.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.8% |
| 2004 | 129.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +151.3% |
| 2005 | 186.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 2006 | 479.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.5% |
| 2007 | 546.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2008 | 217.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.1% |
| 2009 | 171.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 2010 | 630.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +268.2% |
| 2011 | 911.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.7% |
| 2012 | 1,132 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2013 | 616.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.6% |
| 2014 | 430.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 2015 | 196.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.4% |
| 2016 | 188.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2017 | 534.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +183.6% |
| 2018 | 549.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2019 | 104.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.0% |
| 2020 | 76.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.2% |
| 2021 | 489.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +535.3% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Finland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +5198.4% | 0.6535 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2021 | +535.3% | 76.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 489.01 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 83.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 181.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 69.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 253.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 67.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 35.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 130.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 187.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6535 current US$ per square kilometre | 546.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 529.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 104.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,132 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 282.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 76.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 489.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 62 Mauritania 632.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 63 Greece 599.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 64 North Korea 515.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 66 Vietnam 449.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 67 Albania 416.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 68 Morocco 388.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Finland
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.48 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.51 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 6.68 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0211 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 1,183 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled -285.87 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -103.27 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit -0.0009 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita -50.63 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 24.81 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Finland?
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Finland was 489.01 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 1,132 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6535 current US$ per square kilometre in 2001.
- How does Finland rank for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Finland ranks 65th out of 216 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.