Finland vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Finland
489.01 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mauritania
632.01 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Finland rank
65th
Mauritania rank
62nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Finland
  • Mauritania
02505007501.0k1.2k197019952021

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 632.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 489.01 current US$ per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 143 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.3 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 65th and Mauritania ranks 62nd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Mauritania Difference Ahead
1970s 83.59 current US$ per square kilometre 20.64 current US$ per square kilometre 62.95 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
1980s 69.75 current US$ per square kilometre 25.26 current US$ per square kilometre 44.49 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
1990s 67.94 current US$ per square kilometre 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre 62.21 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 187.29 current US$ per square kilometre 148.8 current US$ per square kilometre 38.49 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 529.44 current US$ per square kilometre 215.4 current US$ per square kilometre 314.03 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 282.99 current US$ per square kilometre 326.8 current US$ per square kilometre 43.81 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Finland or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 632.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 489.01 current US$ per square kilometre in Finland as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Finland and Mauritania?
143 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mauritania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Finland and Mauritania rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Finland ranks 65th and Mauritania ranks 62nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/mauritania/">Finland vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.