Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre in South Sudan
South Sudan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre was 1,572 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre in South Sudan, 2012–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2021, adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre in South Sudan stood at 1,572 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 77.6% on the previous year and up 5,023.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre in South Sudan peaked at 2,731 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, 30.67 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2012.
That places South Sudan 76th out of 206 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre in South Sudan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 30.67 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2013 | 1,108 current US$ per square kilometre | +3512.6% |
| 2014 | 2,731 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.5% |
| 2015 | 906.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.8% |
| 2016 | 602.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.5% |
| 2017 | 716.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 2018 | 933 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.2% |
| 2019 | 1,244 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 2020 | 884.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 2021 | 1,572 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.6% |
South Sudan compared with similar countries
- South Sudan's 1,572 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for low income countries, which is 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre, 377.6× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- South Sudan's 1,572 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre, 888.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,034 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,731 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2020s | 1,228 current US$ per square kilometre | 884.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,572 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near South Sudan
- 73 Cameroon 2,182 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 74 Belarus 2,171 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 75 Czechia 1,671 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 77 Syria 1,384 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 78 Japan 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 79 Turkey 1,260 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for South Sudan
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.82 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 5.77 Percent per annum (2029)
- GDP (current LCU), annual growth rate 4.99 % change on previous year (2015)
- Gdp worldbank constant usd, per capita 1,080 units per person (2015)
- GDP (current LCU), per unit of GDP 3.6 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2015)
- GDP (current LCU), per capita 3,893 current LCU per person (2015)
- GDP (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate -10.79 % change on previous year (2015)
- GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 1 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2015)
- Manufacturing value added to gdp, per capita 0 units per person (2015)
- Services, value added (current LCU), annual growth rate 29.9 % change on previous year (2015)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre in South Sudan?
- Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre in South Sudan was 1,572 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre recorded in South Sudan?
- The highest recorded value was 2,731 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre recorded in South Sudan?
- The lowest recorded value was 30.67 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- How does South Sudan rank for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
- South Sudan ranks 76th out of 206 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in South Sudan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5,023.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Sudan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted savings: energy depletion Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.