Belarus vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Belarus
2,171 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Sudan
1,572 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Belarus rank
74th
South Sudan rank
76th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • South Sudan
01.0k2.0k3.0k199220062021

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 2,171 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,572 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 599 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.4 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 74th and South Sudan ranks 76th of 206 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 1,678 current US$ per square kilometre 1,034 current US$ per square kilometre 643.97 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 1,508 current US$ per square kilometre 1,228 current US$ per square kilometre 280.27 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Belarus or South Sudan?
Belarus, at 2,171 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,572 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Belarus and South Sudan?
599 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Belarus and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 74th and South Sudan ranks 76th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/south-sudan/">Belarus vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.