Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean
Latin America & Caribbean: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre was 215,308 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ▲ Rising
Latest (2021)
215,308 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 4.1%
Rank
26th
of 36 groups
All-time high
222,105 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2019
All-time low
55,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 1970
Years of data
52
1970–2021
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean, 1970–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean is 215,308 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2021.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.1% on the previous year and up 8.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean peaked at 222,105 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2019 and was at its lowest, 55,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
That places Latin America & Caribbean 26th out of 36 groups with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 52 years of available data.
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean, year by year
| Year | constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 55,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 59,900 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1972 | 64,244 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1973 | 70,252 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1974 | 73,617 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1975 | 75,548 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1976 | 79,944 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1977 | 83,281 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1978 | 81,566 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1979 | 90,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1980 | 97,138 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1981 | 97,502 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1982 | 94,561 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1983 | 88,373 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 1984 | 87,953 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1985 | 89,405 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1986 | 92,055 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1987 | 93,691 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1988 | 94,052 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1989 | 98,067 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1990 | 101,771 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1991 | 107,478 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1992 | 111,591 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1993 | 114,660 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1994 | 122,164 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1995 | 123,352 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1996 | 129,090 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1997 | 136,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1998 | 139,007 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1999 | 137,223 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2000 | 140,990 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2001 | 141,352 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2002 | 142,040 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2003 | 143,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2004 | 149,986 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2005 | 154,122 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2006 | 165,937 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2007 | 176,569 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2008 | 181,645 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2009 | 178,156 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2010 | 190,078 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2011 | 198,060 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2012 | 200,793 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2013 | 207,927 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2014 | 210,526 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2015 | 212,933 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2016 | 212,135 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2017 | 218,864 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2018 | 219,584 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2019 | 222,105 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2020 | 206,876 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2021 | 215,308 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 73,420 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 55,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 90,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 93,280 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 87,953 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 98,067 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 122,290 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 101,771 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 139,007 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 157,460 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 140,990 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 181,645 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 209,300 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 190,078 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 222,105 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 211,092 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 206,876 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 215,308 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean
- 23 Lebanon 2.35 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Bangladesh 2.28 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Cyprus 2.16 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Spain 2.07 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Slovenia 2.06 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Czechia 1.99 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Brunei 1.94 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Latin America & Caribbean
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) 0.6869 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 2.15 % change on previous year (2025)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 0.1354 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 1,502 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) 4.28 % change on previous year (2025)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) 2.5 % change on previous year (2025)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) 6,410 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) 0.5777 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 1,782 current US$ per person (2025)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) 7,621 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean was 215,308 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The highest recorded value was 222,105 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2019.
- What is the lowest adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The lowest recorded value was 55,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean rank for adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 26th out of 36 groups with data for 2021.
- Is adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted net national income Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.