2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 60 % in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Zimbabwe, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2025, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Zimbabwe stood at 60 %.
That represents a change of up 328.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Zimbabwe peaked at 67 % in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0 %, in 2002.
That places Zimbabwe 8th out of 120 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 60 % | — |
| 2001 | 60 % | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0 % | -100.0% |
| 2003 | 0 % | — |
| 2012 | 50 % | — |
| 2013 | 67 % | +34.0% |
| 2014 | 14 % | -79.1% |
| 2015 | 14 % | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 14 % | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 19 % | +35.7% |
| 2018 | 19 % | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 19 % | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 19 % | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 19 % | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 19 % | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 19 % | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 60 % | +215.8% |
| 2025 | 60 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 % | 0 % | 60 % | 4 |
| 2010s | 27 % | 14 % | 67 % | 8 |
| 2020s | 32.67 % | 19 % | 60 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 5 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 % compare
- 5 Djibouti 67 % compare
- 5 Republic of Moldova 0 %
- 5 Sweden 67 % compare
- 5 Syrian Arab Republic 0 %
- 5 United Republic of Tanzania 0 % compare
- 5 Viet Nam 0 %
- 7 Belgium 63 % compare
- 9 El Salvador 50 % compare
- 9 Turkmenistan 50 % compare
- 11 New Zealand 48 % compare
More economy & growth data for Zimbabwe
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.02 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 131.30 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0032 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 7.89 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 465.43 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -22.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0112 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 27.98 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 319.78 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Zimbabwe?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Zimbabwe was 60 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 67 % in 2013.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 % in 2002.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- Zimbabwe ranks 8th out of 120 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 328.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.