2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in El Salvador
El Salvador: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 50 % in 2010. ▬ Flat
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in El Salvador, 2000–2010
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in El Salvador is 50 %, measured in 2010. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in El Salvador peaked at 50 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 50 %, in 2000.
That places El Salvador 9th out of 120 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the top 10%.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in El Salvador, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 50 % | — |
| 2001 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 50 % | +0.0% |
El Salvador compared with similar countries
- El Salvador's 50 % is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3 %, 16.7× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 % | 50 % | 50 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 50 % | 50 % | 50 % | 1 |
Countries ranked near El Salvador
- 7 Belgium 63 % compare
- 8 Zimbabwe 60 % compare
- 9 Turkmenistan 50 % compare
- 11 New Zealand 48 % compare
- 12 Australia and New Zealand 47 % compare
More economy & growth data for El Salvador
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.92 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 318.29 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0087 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 50 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 763.72 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -27.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0208 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 119.98 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 30 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in El Salvador?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in El Salvador was 50 % in 2010, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in El Salvador?
- The highest recorded value was 50 % in 2000.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in El Salvador?
- The lowest recorded value was 50 % in 2000.
- How does El Salvador rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- El Salvador ranks 9th out of 120 countries with data for 2010.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in El Salvador?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this El Salvador data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.