2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Poland
Poland: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 12 % in 2025. ▼ Falling
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Poland, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2025, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Poland stood at 12 %. That is the lowest value across all 26 years on record.
The figure is down 20.0% on the previous year and down 25.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Poland peaked at 33 % in 2007 and was at its lowest, 12 %, in 2025.
That places Poland 45th out of 120 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Poland, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 24 % | — |
| 2001 | 24 % | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 24 % | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 27 % | +12.5% |
| 2004 | 27 % | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 27 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 31 % | +14.8% |
| 2007 | 33 % | +6.5% |
| 2008 | 29 % | -12.1% |
| 2009 | 29 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 16 % | -44.8% |
| 2011 | 14 % | -12.5% |
| 2012 | 17 % | +21.4% |
| 2013 | 17 % | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 16 % | -5.9% |
| 2015 | 16 % | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 16 % | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 16 % | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 16 % | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 15 % | -6.2% |
| 2020 | 15 % | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 15 % | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 15 % | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 15 % | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 15 % | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 12 % | -20.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.5 % | 24 % | 33 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 15.9 % | 14 % | 17 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 14.5 % | 12 % | 15 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More economy & growth data for Poland
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 8.38 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0081 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 229.86 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 20.03 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -2.81 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0193 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 549.65 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 21.82 % change on previous year (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2625 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita 7,460 includes gold, current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Poland?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Poland was 12 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 33 % in 2007.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 12 % in 2025.
- How does Poland rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- Poland ranks 45th out of 120 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.