2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern America and Europe
Northern America and Europe: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 53 % in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern America and Europe, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2025, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern America and Europe stood at 53 %.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern America and Europe peaked at 54 % in 2011 and was at its lowest, 47 %, in 2000.
That places Northern America and Europe 1st out of 29 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern America and Europe, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 47 % | — |
| 2001 | 50 % | +6.4% |
| 2002 | 51 % | +2.0% |
| 2003 | 52 % | +2.0% |
| 2004 | 51 % | -1.9% |
| 2005 | 51 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 51 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 52 % | +2.0% |
| 2008 | 52 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 53 % | +1.9% |
| 2010 | 53 % | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 54 % | +1.9% |
| 2012 | 53 % | -1.9% |
| 2013 | 52 % | -1.9% |
| 2014 | 52 % | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 53 % | +1.9% |
| 2016 | 53 % | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 53 % | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 53 % | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 54 % | +1.9% |
| 2020 | 54 % | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 54 % | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 54 % | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 53 % | -1.9% |
| 2024 | 53 % | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 53 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51 % | 47 % | 53 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 53 % | 52 % | 54 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 53.5 % | 53 % | 54 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near Northern America and Europe
- 1 Belarus 100 % compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 100 % compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 100 % compare
- 1 Lao People's Democratic Republic 100 % compare
- 1 Nicaragua 100 % compare
- 3 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 14 % compare
- 4 Türkiye 7 % compare
More economy & growth data for Northern America and Europe
- 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value 747 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value 173 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value 680 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value 886 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value 3,075 No (2025)
- 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value 3,621 No (2025)
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) 17.3 % (2023)
- 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of 83 % (2025)
- 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements 55,703 No (2025)
- 15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International 36 No (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern America and Europe?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern America and Europe was 53 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Northern America and Europe?
- The highest recorded value was 54 % in 2011.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Northern America and Europe?
- The lowest recorded value was 47 % in 2000.
- How does Northern America and Europe rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- Northern America and Europe ranks 1st out of 29 groups with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in Northern America and Europe?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Northern America and Europe data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.