2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Northern America and Europe
Northern America and Europe: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value was 886 No in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Northern America and Europe, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
In 2025, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in Northern America and Europe stood at 886 No.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.9% on the previous year and down 8.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in Northern America and Europe peaked at 1,209 No in 2006 and was at its lowest, 88 No, in 2001.
That places Northern America and Europe 2nd out of 32 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Northern America and Europe, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 99 No | — |
| 2001 | 88 No | -11.1% |
| 2002 | 88 No | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 158 No | +79.5% |
| 2004 | 259 No | +63.9% |
| 2005 | 295 No | +13.9% |
| 2006 | 1,209 No | +309.8% |
| 2007 | 1,161 No | -4.0% |
| 2008 | 1,137 No | -2.1% |
| 2009 | 1,066 No | -6.2% |
| 2010 | 1,012 No | -5.1% |
| 2011 | 1,014 No | +0.2% |
| 2012 | 1,045 No | +3.1% |
| 2013 | 1,055 No | +1.0% |
| 2014 | 998 No | -5.4% |
| 2015 | 968 No | -3.0% |
| 2016 | 929 No | -4.0% |
| 2017 | 912 No | -1.8% |
| 2018 | 848 No | -7.0% |
| 2019 | 806 No | -5.0% |
| 2020 | 819 No | +1.6% |
| 2021 | 819 No | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 859 No | +4.9% |
| 2023 | 860 No | +0.1% |
| 2024 | 853 No | -0.8% |
| 2025 | 886 No | +3.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 556 No | 88 No | 1,209 No | 10 |
| 2010s | 958.7 No | 806 No | 1,055 No | 10 |
| 2020s | 849.33 No | 819 No | 886 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near Northern America and Europe
More economy & growth data for Northern America and Europe
- 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value 747 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value 680 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value 173 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value 3,075 No (2025)
- 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value 3,621 No (2025)
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) 17.3 % (2023)
- 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of 83 % (2025)
- 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements 55,703 No (2025)
- 15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International 36 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk 53 % (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in Northern America and Europe?
- 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in Northern America and Europe was 886 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Northern America and Europe?
- The highest recorded value was 1,209 No in 2006.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Northern America and Europe?
- The lowest recorded value was 88 No in 2001.
- How does Northern America and Europe rank for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value?
- Northern America and Europe ranks 2nd out of 32 groups with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value rising or falling in Northern America and Europe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Northern America and Europe data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.