2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Central Asia and Southern Asia
Central Asia and Southern Asia: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 15 % in 2013. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Central Asia and Southern Asia, 2000–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2013, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Central Asia and Southern Asia stood at 15 %.
That represents a change of down 28.6% on the previous year and down 16.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Central Asia and Southern Asia peaked at 25 % in 2007 and was at its lowest, 5.88 %, in 2000.
That places Central Asia and Southern Asia 21st out of 29 groups with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Central Asia and Southern Asia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 5.88 % | — |
| 2001 | 5.88 % | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 10.71 % | +82.1% |
| 2003 | 18 % | +68.1% |
| 2004 | 23 % | +27.8% |
| 2005 | 23 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 23 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 25 % | +8.7% |
| 2008 | 25 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 24 % | -4.0% |
| 2010 | 24 % | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 24 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 21 % | -12.5% |
| 2013 | 15 % | -28.6% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Central Asia and Southern Asia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +82.1% | 5.88 % | 10.71 % |
| 2003 | +68.1% | 10.71 % | 18 % |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.35 % | 5.88 % | 25 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 21 % | 15 % | 24 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near Central Asia and Southern Asia
More economy & growth data for Central Asia and Southern Asia
- 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value 194 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value 140 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value 193 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value 546 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value 796 No (2025)
- 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value 811 No (2025)
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) 48.7 % (2023)
- 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of 13.89 % (2013)
- 2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value 9.1 % (2025)
- 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements 19,719 No (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Central Asia and Southern Asia?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Central Asia and Southern Asia was 15 % in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Central Asia and Southern Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 25 % in 2007.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Central Asia and Southern Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.88 % in 2000.
- How does Central Asia and Southern Asia rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- Central Asia and Southern Asia ranks 21st out of 29 groups with data for 2013.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in Central Asia and Southern Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Central Asia and Southern Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.