2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Malaysia
Malaysia: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 40 % in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Malaysia, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
Malaysia recorded 40 % for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in 2025. That is the highest value across all 26 years on record.
That represents a change of up 207.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Malaysia peaked at 40 % in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 %, in 2004.
Malaysia ranks 18th of 120 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Malaysia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 25 % | — |
| 2001 | 25 % | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 25 % | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 25 % | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0 % | -100.0% |
| 2005 | 0 % | — |
| 2006 | 20 % | — |
| 2007 | 20 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 17 % | -15.0% |
| 2009 | 17 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 13 % | -23.5% |
| 2011 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 24 % | +84.6% |
| 2018 | 25 % | +4.2% |
| 2019 | 22 % | -12.0% |
| 2020 | 40 % | +81.8% |
| 2021 | 40 % | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 40 % | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 40 % | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 40 % | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 40 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.4 % | 0 % | 25 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 16.2 % | 13 % | 25 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 40 % | 40 % | 40 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near Malaysia
More economy & growth data for Malaysia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.04 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3.97 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 13.04 billion BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0309 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 366.69 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 15.59 billion BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 96.92 % change on previous year (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0369 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 438.53 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 8.09 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Malaysia?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Malaysia was 40 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Malaysia?
- The highest recorded value was 40 % in 2020.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Malaysia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 % in 2004.
- How does Malaysia rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- Malaysia ranks 18th out of 120 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in Malaysia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 207.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Malaysia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.