2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Africa

Southern Africa: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 74 % in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
74 %
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
10th
of 31 groups
All-time high
100 %
in 2009
All-time low
63 %
in 2022
Years of data
26
2000–2025

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Africa, 2000–2025

0204060801002000201220252000: 64 %2001: 64 %2002: 65 %2003: 87 %2004: 92 %2005: 96 %2006: 96 %2007: 96 %2008: 95 %2009: 100 %2010: 100 %2011: 85 %2012: 87 %2013: 82 %2014: 68 %2015: 67 %2016: 68 %2017: 69 %2018: 69 %2019: 69 %2020: 69 %2021: 67 %2022: 63 %2023: 63 %2024: 74 %2025: 74 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2025, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Africa stood at 74 %.

That represents a change of up 10.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Africa peaked at 100 % in 2009 and was at its lowest, 63 %, in 2022.

That places Southern Africa 10th out of 31 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Africa, year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Southern Africa, 2000 to 2025.
Year % Change
2000 64 %
2001 64 % +0.0%
2002 65 % +1.6%
2003 87 % +33.8%
2004 92 % +5.7%
2005 96 % +4.3%
2006 96 % +0.0%
2007 96 % +0.0%
2008 95 % -1.0%
2009 100 % +5.3%
2010 100 % +0.0%
2011 85 % -15.0%
2012 87 % +2.4%
2013 82 % -5.7%
2014 68 % -17.1%
2015 67 % -1.5%
2016 68 % +1.5%
2017 69 % +1.5%
2018 69 % +0.0%
2019 69 % +0.0%
2020 69 % +0.0%
2021 67 % -2.9%
2022 63 % -6.0%
2023 63 % +0.0%
2024 74 % +17.5%
2025 74 % +0.0%

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Africa changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2003 +33.8% 65 % 87 %

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 85.5 % 64 % 100 % 10
2010s 76.4 % 67 % 100 % 10
2020s 68.33 % 63 % 74 % 6

Countries ranked near Southern Africa

  1. 7 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 20 % compare
  2. 7 Viet Nam 20 % compare
  3. 10 United Republic of Tanzania 19 % compare
  4. 11 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 % compare
  5. 11 Syrian Arab Republic 0 % compare

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More economy & growth data for Southern Africa

All data for Southern Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Africa?
2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Africa was 74 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Southern Africa?
The highest recorded value was 100 % in 2009.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Southern Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 63 % in 2022.
How does Southern Africa rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Southern Africa ranks 10th out of 31 groups with data for 2025.
Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Southern Africa?
Over the last ten years it is up 10.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Southern Africa data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Africa. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/southern-africa/">2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.