2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Polynesia

Polynesia: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 40 % in 2010. ▼ Falling

Latest (2010)
40 %
Change on year
down 29.8%
World rank
2nd
of 12 countries
All-time high
57 %
in 2004
All-time low
40 %
in 2010
Years of data
9
2002–2010

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Polynesia, 2002–2010

02040602002200620102002: 55 %2003: 55 %2004: 57 %2005: 57 %2006: 57 %2007: 57 %2008: 57 %2009: 57 %2010: 40 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Polynesia is 40 %, measured in 2010. That is the lowest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is down 29.8% on the previous year and down 27.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Polynesia peaked at 57 % in 2004 and was at its lowest, 40 %, in 2010.

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Polynesia, year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Polynesia, 2002 to 2010.
Year % Change
2002 55 %
2003 55 % +0.0%
2004 57 % +3.6%
2005 57 % +0.0%
2006 57 % +0.0%
2007 57 % +0.0%
2008 57 % +0.0%
2009 57 % +0.0%
2010 40 % -29.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 56.5 % 55 % 57 % 8
2010s 40 % 40 % 40 % 1

Countries ranked near Polynesia

  1. 1 Algeria 100 % compare
  2. 1 Belarus 100 % compare
  3. 1 Belgium 100 % compare
  4. 1 Botswana 100 % compare
  5. 1 Cyprus 100 % compare
  6. 1 Egypt 100 % compare
  7. 1 Estonia 100 % compare
  8. 1 Eswatini 100 % compare
  9. 1 Guatemala 100 % compare
  10. 1 Ireland 100 % compare
  11. 1 Jamaica 100 % compare
  12. 1 Luxembourg 100 %
  13. 1 Madagascar 100 % compare
  14. 1 Malta 100 % compare
  15. 1 Mauritius 100 % compare
  16. 1 Namibia 100 % compare
  17. 1 Nicaragua 100 % compare
  18. 1 Niue 100 % compare
  19. 1 Paraguay 100 % compare
  20. 1 Peru 100 % compare
  21. 1 Republic of Moldova 75 % compare
  22. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 100 % compare
  23. 1 Solomon Islands 100 %
  24. 1 Tonga 100 % compare
  25. 3 Lao People's Democratic Republic 33 % compare
  26. 3 Melanesia 33 % compare
  27. 5 Türkiye 28 % compare

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More economy & growth data for Polynesia

All data for Polynesia →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Polynesia?
2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Polynesia was 40 % in 2010, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Polynesia?
The highest recorded value was 57 % in 2004.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Polynesia?
The lowest recorded value was 40 % in 2010.
How does Polynesia rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Polynesia ranks 2nd out of 12 countries with data for 2010.
Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Polynesia?
Over the last ten years it is down 27.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Polynesia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Polynesia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/polynesia/">2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Polynesia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.