2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Melanesia
Melanesia: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 33 % in 2012. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Melanesia, 2000–2012
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
Melanesia recorded 33 % for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in 2012.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 34.0% on the previous year and unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Melanesia peaked at 50 % in 2003 and was at its lowest, 25 %, in 2000.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Melanesia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 25 % | — |
| 2001 | 29 % | +16.0% |
| 2002 | 33 % | +13.8% |
| 2003 | 50 % | +51.5% |
| 2004 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 43 % | -14.0% |
| 2006 | 43 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 43 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 43 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 43 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 50 % | +16.3% |
| 2011 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 33 % | -34.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.2 % | 25 % | 50 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 44.33 % | 33 % | 50 % | 3 |
Countries ranked near Melanesia
- 1 Algeria 100 % compare
- 1 Belarus 100 % compare
- 1 Belgium 100 % compare
- 1 Botswana 100 % compare
- 1 Cyprus 100 % compare
- 1 Egypt 100 % compare
- 1 Estonia 100 % compare
- 1 Eswatini 100 % compare
- 1 Guatemala 100 % compare
- 1 Ireland 100 % compare
- 1 Jamaica 100 % compare
- 1 Luxembourg 100 %
- 1 Madagascar 100 % compare
- 1 Malta 100 % compare
- 1 Mauritius 100 % compare
- 1 Namibia 100 % compare
- 1 Nicaragua 100 % compare
- 1 Niue 100 % compare
- 1 Paraguay 100 % compare
- 1 Peru 100 % compare
- 1 Republic of Moldova 75 % compare
- 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 100 % compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 100 % compare
- 1 Tonga 100 % compare
- 2 Polynesia 40 % compare
- 3 Lao People's Democratic Republic 33 % compare
- 5 Türkiye 28 % compare
More economy & growth data for Melanesia
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$, 2015 prices 3.74 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$ 2.11 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$, 2015 prices 15.03 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$ 13.74 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices 6,546 million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ 7,131 million USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ per capita, 2015 prices 1.97 % (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita 4,008 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ 51,880 million USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices 43,564 million USD (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Melanesia?
- 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Melanesia was 33 % in 2012, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Melanesia?
- The highest recorded value was 50 % in 2003.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Melanesia?
- The lowest recorded value was 25 % in 2000.
- How does Melanesia rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Melanesia ranks 3rd out of 12 countries with data for 2012.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Melanesia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Melanesia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.