2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Lithuania
Lithuania: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 91 % in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Lithuania, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Lithuania is 91 %, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 9.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Lithuania peaked at 100 % in 2016 and was at its lowest, 50 %, in 2004.
Lithuania ranks 31st of 130 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 23 years of available data.
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 55 % | — |
| 2001 | 67 % | +21.8% |
| 2002 | 67 % | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 54 % | -19.4% |
| 2004 | 50 % | -7.4% |
| 2005 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 55 % | +10.0% |
| 2011 | 50 % | -9.1% |
| 2012 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 100 % | +100.0% |
| 2017 | 92 % | -8.0% |
| 2018 | 94 % | +2.2% |
| 2019 | 94 % | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 74 % | -21.3% |
| 2021 | 83 % | +12.2% |
| 2022 | 86 % | +3.6% |
| 2023 | 91 % | +5.8% |
| 2024 | 91 % | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 91 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.3 % | 50 % | 67 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 76.43 % | 50 % | 100 % | 7 |
| 2020s | 86 % | 74 % | 91 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
- 28 Republic of Korea 94 % compare
- 29 Côte d'Ivoire 0 %
- 29 Montenegro 92 % compare
- 29 Serbia 92 % compare
- 31 Australia and New Zealand 91 % compare
- 33 Italy 90 % compare
- 34 Germany 89 % compare
- 34 Latvia 89 % compare
- 34 Romania 89 % compare
- 34 Sweden 89 % compare
- 34 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 89 % compare
More economy & growth data for Lithuania
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 127.67 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0013 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 44.19 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 3.09 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -34.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0324 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 1,069 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate -4.7 % change on previous year (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0741 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita 2,444 includes gold, current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Lithuania?
- 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Lithuania was 91 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 100 % in 2016.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 50 % in 2004.
- How does Lithuania rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Lithuania ranks 31st out of 130 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.