2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Latvia

Latvia: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 89 % in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
89 %
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
34th
of 130 countries
All-time high
89 %
in 2020
All-time low
33 %
in 2004
Years of data
26
2000–2025

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Latvia, 2000–2025

0204060802000201220252000: 50 %2001: 50 %2002: 50 %2003: 50 %2004: 33 %2005: 33 %2006: 33 %2007: 33 %2008: 33 %2009: 33 %2010: 33 %2011: 33 %2012: 33 %2013: 86 %2014: 86 %2015: 86 %2016: 86 %2017: 86 %2018: 86 %2019: 86 %2020: 89 %2021: 89 %2022: 89 %2023: 89 %2024: 89 %2025: 89 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2025, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Latvia stood at 89 %. That is the highest value across all 26 years on record.

The figure is up 3.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Latvia peaked at 89 % in 2020 and was at its lowest, 33 %, in 2004.

Latvia ranks 34th of 130 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Latvia, 2000 to 2025.
Year % Change
2000 50 %
2001 50 % +0.0%
2002 50 % +0.0%
2003 50 % +0.0%
2004 33 % -34.0%
2005 33 % +0.0%
2006 33 % +0.0%
2007 33 % +0.0%
2008 33 % +0.0%
2009 33 % +0.0%
2010 33 % +0.0%
2011 33 % +0.0%
2012 33 % +0.0%
2013 86 % +160.6%
2014 86 % +0.0%
2015 86 % +0.0%
2016 86 % +0.0%
2017 86 % +0.0%
2018 86 % +0.0%
2019 86 % +0.0%
2020 89 % +3.5%
2021 89 % +0.0%
2022 89 % +0.0%
2023 89 % +0.0%
2024 89 % +0.0%
2025 89 % +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 39.8 % 33 % 50 % 10
2010s 70.1 % 33 % 86 % 10
2020s 89 % 89 % 89 % 6

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 31 Lithuania 91 % compare
  2. 31 Australia and New Zealand 91 % compare
  3. 33 Italy 90 % compare
  4. 34 Germany 89 % compare
  5. 34 Romania 89 % compare
  6. 34 Sweden 89 % compare
  7. 34 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 89 % compare

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More economy & growth data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Latvia?
2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Latvia was 89 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 89 % in 2020.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 33 % in 2004.
How does Latvia rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Latvia ranks 34th out of 130 countries with data for 2025.
Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Latvia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/latvia/">2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.