2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Southern Europe
Southern Europe: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value was 28 No in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Southern Europe, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
Southern Europe recorded 28 No for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in 2025.
That represents a change of down 3.4% on the previous year and down 33.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Southern Europe peaked at 65 No in 2007 and was at its lowest, 3 No, in 2000.
That places Southern Europe 31st out of 33 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Southern Europe, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 3 No | — |
| 2001 | 3 No | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 3 No | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 5 No | +66.7% |
| 2004 | 11 No | +120.0% |
| 2005 | 8 No | -27.3% |
| 2006 | 64 No | +700.0% |
| 2007 | 65 No | +1.6% |
| 2008 | 62 No | -4.6% |
| 2009 | 57 No | -8.1% |
| 2010 | 55 No | -3.5% |
| 2011 | 55 No | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 45 No | -18.2% |
| 2013 | 40 No | -11.1% |
| 2014 | 40 No | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 42 No | +5.0% |
| 2016 | 24 No | -42.9% |
| 2017 | 24 No | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 21 No | -12.5% |
| 2019 | 21 No | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 21 No | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 21 No | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 28 No | +33.3% |
| 2023 | 28 No | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 29 No | +3.6% |
| 2025 | 28 No | -3.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.1 No | 3 No | 65 No | 10 |
| 2010s | 36.7 No | 21 No | 55 No | 10 |
| 2020s | 25.83 No | 21 No | 29 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near Southern Europe
- 29 China, mainland 37 No compare
- 30 Burkina Faso 36 No compare
- 31 Togo 35 No compare
- 32 Azerbaijan 34 No compare
- 32 Trinidad and Tobago 34 No compare
- 33 Cabo Verde 1 No compare
- 34 Bangladesh 33 No compare
- 34 South Africa 33 No compare
More economy & growth data for Southern Europe
- Gross Domestic Product, GDP in millions constant 2021 international $ 7.33 million (2027)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ 5.03 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$ 20.85 % (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita 33,234 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita, 2015 prices 27,640 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices 4.18 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ 4.81 % (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ per capita 5.14 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$ 3.1 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$, 2015 prices 21.32 % (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Southern Europe?
- 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Southern Europe was 28 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Southern Europe?
- The highest recorded value was 65 No in 2007.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Southern Europe?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 No in 2000.
- How does Southern Europe rank for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value?
- Southern Europe ranks 31st out of 33 groups with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value rising or falling in Southern Europe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Southern Europe data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.