2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in China, mainland
China, mainland: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value was 37 No in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in China, mainland, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
China, mainland recorded 37 No for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in 2025.
The figure is down 46.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in China, mainland peaked at 76 No in 2018 and was at its lowest, 17 No, in 2005.
China, mainland ranks 29th of 180 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in China, mainland, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 18 No | — |
| 2001 | 18 No | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 18 No | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 18 No | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 18 No | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 17 No | -5.6% |
| 2006 | 73 No | +329.4% |
| 2007 | 70 No | -4.1% |
| 2008 | 68 No | -2.9% |
| 2009 | 68 No | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 68 No | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 68 No | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 68 No | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 68 No | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 68 No | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 69 No | +1.5% |
| 2016 | 71 No | +2.9% |
| 2017 | 74 No | +4.2% |
| 2018 | 76 No | +2.7% |
| 2019 | 76 No | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 76 No | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 37 No | -51.3% |
| 2022 | 37 No | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 37 No | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 37 No | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 37 No | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.6 No | 17 No | 73 No | 10 |
| 2010s | 70.6 No | 68 No | 76 No | 10 |
| 2020s | 43.5 No | 37 No | 76 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near China, mainland
- 26 Colombia 42 No compare
- 27 Antigua and Barbuda 40 No compare
- 27 Japan 40 No compare
- 30 Burkina Faso 36 No compare
- 31 Togo 35 No compare
- 32 Azerbaijan 34 No compare
- 32 Trinidad and Tobago 34 No compare
More economy & growth data for China, mainland
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$, 2015 prices 40.34 % (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ per capita, 2015 prices 4.29 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency 56.10 million million SLC (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ 7.79 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 44.89 million million SLC (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices 7.21 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$ 40.83 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$ 5.95 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth Standard Local 4.06 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth Standard Local Currency 7.65 % (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in China, mainland?
- 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in China, mainland was 37 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in China, mainland?
- The highest recorded value was 76 No in 2018.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in China, mainland?
- The lowest recorded value was 17 No in 2005.
- How does China, mainland rank for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value?
- China, mainland ranks 29th out of 180 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value rising or falling in China, mainland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this China, mainland data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.