2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Poland
Poland: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value was 14 No in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Poland, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Poland is 14 No, measured in 2025.
The figure is up 1,300.0% on the previous year and up 366.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Poland peaked at 43 No in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 No, in 2000.
That places Poland 89th out of 180 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Poland, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 No | — |
| 2001 | 0 No | — |
| 2002 | 0 No | — |
| 2003 | 2 No | — |
| 2004 | 2 No | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2 No | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 43 No | +2050.0% |
| 2007 | 43 No | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 41 No | -4.7% |
| 2009 | 41 No | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 13 No | -68.3% |
| 2011 | 8 No | -38.5% |
| 2012 | 6 No | -25.0% |
| 2013 | 6 No | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 5 No | -16.7% |
| 2015 | 3 No | -40.0% |
| 2016 | 3 No | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 No | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 No | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 No | -66.7% |
| 2020 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 14 No | +1300.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.4 No | 0 No | 43 No | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.1 No | 1 No | 13 No | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.17 No | 1 No | 14 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 89 Algeria 14 No compare
- 89 Belarus 14 No compare
- 89 Central African Republic 14 No compare
- 89 Ecuador 14 No compare
- 89 Ethiopia 14 No compare
- 89 Gabon 14 No compare
- 89 Guinea-Bissau 14 No compare
- 89 Papua New Guinea 14 No compare
- 89 Serbia 14 No compare
- 89 Sierra Leone 14 No compare
- 89 Tunisia 14 No compare
- 89 Turkmenistan 14 No compare
More economy & growth data for Poland
- Services, value added (constant LCU), per capita 42,027 constant LCU per person (2025)
- GDP deflator (base year varies by country), annual growth rate 2.91 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), annual growth 11.68 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.8803 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per capita 25,018 current US$ per person (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), annual growth 5.5 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per unit of GDP 3.31 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per capita 94,080 current LCU per person (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), annual 3.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit 0.5792 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Poland?
- 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Poland was 14 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 43 No in 2006.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 No in 2000.
- How does Poland rank for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value?
- Poland ranks 89th out of 180 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 366.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.