2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Montenegro
Montenegro: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value was 2 No in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Montenegro, 2006–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
Montenegro recorded 2 No for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Montenegro peaked at 5 No in 2006 and was at its lowest, 1 No, in 2011.
That places Montenegro 145th out of 180 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Montenegro, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 5 No | — |
| 2007 | 5 No | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 5 No | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 5 No | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 5 No | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1 No | -80.0% |
| 2012 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2 No | +100.0% |
| 2024 | 2 No | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2 No | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 No | 5 No | 5 No | 4 |
| 2010s | 1.4 No | 1 No | 5 No | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.5 No | 1 No | 2 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near Montenegro
- 145 Anguilla 2 No compare
- 145 Djibouti 2 No compare
- 145 Equatorial Guinea 2 No compare
- 145 Finland 2 No compare
- 145 Montserrat 2 No compare
- 145 Niger 2 No compare
- 145 Puerto Rico 2 No compare
- 145 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2 No compare
- 145 Sudan 2 No compare
- 145 Yemen 2 No compare
More economy & growth data for Montenegro
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.15 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Services, value added (current US$), annual growth rate 10.9 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.6338 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), per capita 9,391 current US$ per person (2025)
- Services, value added (current LCU), annual growth rate 6.23 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP 0.5609 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Services, value added (current LCU), per capita 8,311 current LCU per person (2025)
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 1.62 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.3796 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Montenegro?
- 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Montenegro was 2 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Montenegro?
- The highest recorded value was 5 No in 2006.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Montenegro?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 No in 2011.
- How does Montenegro rank for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value?
- Montenegro ranks 145th out of 180 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value rising or falling in Montenegro?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Montenegro data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.