2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … not square in Australia
Australia: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … not square was 0 No per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square in Australia, 2000–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in No per square kilometre.
Analysis
Australia recorded 0 No per square kilometre for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square in 2023. That is the highest value across all 24 years on record.
That represents a change of up 36.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square in Australia peaked at 0 No per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0 No per square kilometre, in 2003.
That places Australia 154th out of 162 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.
2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … not square in Australia, year by year
| Year | No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2001 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0 No per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2003 | 0 No per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 2004 | 0 No per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2005 | 0 No per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2006 | 0 No per square kilometre | +500.0% |
| 2007 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0 No per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2015 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0 No per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2017 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0 No per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 2022 | 0 No per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2023 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
Australia compared with similar countries
- Australia's 0 No per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.0005 No per square kilometre, 2% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Australia's 0 No per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.0002 No per square kilometre, 5% of the median. (20 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Australia
More economy & growth data for Australia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.36 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.26 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate 15.83 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0083 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 537.43 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate 10.3 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.006 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 392.43 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 2.82 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0037 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square in Australia?
- 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square in Australia was 0 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square recorded in Australia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 No per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square recorded in Australia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 No per square kilometre in 2003.
- How does Australia rank for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square?
- Australia ranks 154th out of 162 countries with data for 2023.
- Is 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square rising or falling in Australia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 36.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Australia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.