2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value in Australia
Australia: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value was 74 No in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value in Australia, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
Australia recorded 74 No for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value in 2025. That is the highest value across all 26 years on record.
That represents a change of up 39.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value in Australia peaked at 74 No in 2022 and was at its lowest, 9 No, in 2003.
Australia ranks 20th of 174 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value in Australia, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 13 No | — |
| 2001 | 13 No | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 12 No | -7.7% |
| 2003 | 9 No | -25.0% |
| 2004 | 10 No | +11.1% |
| 2005 | 9 No | -10.0% |
| 2006 | 54 No | +500.0% |
| 2007 | 54 No | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 54 No | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 54 No | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 54 No | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 54 No | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 54 No | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 54 No | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 53 No | -1.9% |
| 2015 | 53 No | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 53 No | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 53 No | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 53 No | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 53 No | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 53 No | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 63 No | +18.9% |
| 2022 | 74 No | +17.5% |
| 2023 | 74 No | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 74 No | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 74 No | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.2 No | 9 No | 54 No | 10 |
| 2010s | 53.4 No | 53 No | 54 No | 10 |
| 2020s | 68.67 No | 53 No | 74 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near Australia
- 17 Republic of Korea 86 No compare
- 18 Bulgaria 84 No compare
- 19 Kazakhstan 75 No compare
- 21 Belgium 69 No compare
- 21 New Zealand 69 No compare
- 23 Sweden 64 No compare
More economy & growth data for Australia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.36 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.26 Percent per annum (2029)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), annual growth 3.62 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per unit of GDP 1.45 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per capita 94,238 current LCU per person (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), annual 1.25 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit 0.8814 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per 57,404 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), annual growth 1.25 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of 1.41 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value in Australia?
- 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value in Australia was 74 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value recorded in Australia?
- The highest recorded value was 74 No in 2022.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value recorded in Australia?
- The lowest recorded value was 9 No in 2003.
- How does Australia rank for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value?
- Australia ranks 20th out of 174 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value rising or falling in Australia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Australia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.