2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Guatemala

Guatemala: 2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value was 12.7 % in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
12.7 %
Change on year
down 3.1%
World rank
38th
of 115 countries
All-time high
22.5 %
in 2001
All-time low
12.7 %
in 2024
Years of data
24
2001–2024

2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Guatemala, 2001–2024

05101520252001201220242001: 22.5 %2002: 20.2 %2003: 19.3 %2004: 19.6 %2005: 19.3 %2006: 18.2 %2007: 18.7 %2008: 18.3 %2009: 17.2 %2010: 15.3 %2011: 14.5 %2012: 14.9 %2013: 15.3 %2014: 15.4 %2015: 14.8 %2016: 14 %2017: 13.7 %2018: 13.4 %2019: 13.5 %2020: 13.9 %2021: 14 %2022: 14 %2023: 13.1 %2024: 12.7 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

Guatemala recorded 12.7 % for 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 24 years on record.

That represents a change of down 3.1% on the previous year and down 17.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value in Guatemala peaked at 22.5 % in 2001 and was at its lowest, 12.7 %, in 2024.

Guatemala ranks 38th of 115 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Guatemala, year by year

Annual values for 2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Guatemala, 2001 to 2024.
Year % Change
2001 22.5 %
2002 20.2 % -10.2%
2003 19.3 % -4.5%
2004 19.6 % +1.6%
2005 19.3 % -1.5%
2006 18.2 % -5.7%
2007 18.7 % +2.7%
2008 18.3 % -2.1%
2009 17.2 % -6.0%
2010 15.3 % -11.0%
2011 14.5 % -5.2%
2012 14.9 % +2.8%
2013 15.3 % +2.7%
2014 15.4 % +0.7%
2015 14.8 % -3.9%
2016 14 % -5.4%
2017 13.7 % -2.1%
2018 13.4 % -2.2%
2019 13.5 % +0.7%
2020 13.9 % +3.0%
2021 14 % +0.7%
2022 14 % +0.0%
2023 13.1 % -6.4%
2024 12.7 % -3.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 19.26 % 17.2 % 22.5 % 9
2010s 14.48 % 13.4 % 15.4 % 10
2020s 13.54 % 12.7 % 14 % 5

Countries ranked near Guatemala

  1. 35 Honduras 14.3 % compare
  2. 36 Iraq 13.4 % compare
  3. 37 Niger 12.9 % compare
  4. 38 Suriname 12.7 % compare
  5. 40 Jordan 12.2 % compare
  6. 41 Mali 12.1 % compare

See the full ranking of 158 places →

More economy & growth data for Guatemala

All data for Guatemala →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value in Guatemala?
2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value in Guatemala was 12.7 % in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value recorded in Guatemala?
The highest recorded value was 22.5 % in 2001.
What is the lowest 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value recorded in Guatemala?
The lowest recorded value was 12.7 % in 2024.
How does Guatemala rank for 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value?
Guatemala ranks 38th out of 115 countries with data for 2024.
Is 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value rising or falling in Guatemala?
Over the last ten years it is down 17.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Guatemala data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Guatemala. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-1-1-prevalence-of-undernourishment-value/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-1-1-prevalence-of-undernourishment-value/guatemala/">2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Guatemala</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
158 places, 3,513 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.