2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Georgia

Georgia: 2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value was 2.7 % in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
2.7 %
Change on year
down 28.9%
World rank
99th
of 115 countries
All-time high
8.8 %
in 2011
All-time low
2.7 %
in 2023
Years of data
23
2001–2023

2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Georgia, 2001–2023

24682001201220232001: 6.6 %2002: 5 %2003: 4.3 %2004: 4.3 %2005: 4.8 %2006: 5.3 %2007: 5.9 %2008: 6.7 %2009: 7.9 %2010: 8.6 %2011: 8.8 %2012: 8.3 %2013: 7.9 %2014: 7.4 %2015: 7.4 %2016: 7.1 %2017: 6.6 %2018: 5.4 %2019: 5.6 %2020: 5.5 %2021: 5.4 %2022: 3.8 %2023: 2.7 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

Georgia recorded 2.7 % for 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 23 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 28.9% on the previous year and down 65.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value in Georgia peaked at 8.8 % in 2011 and was at its lowest, 2.7 %, in 2023.

Georgia ranks 99th of 115 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 23 years of available data.

2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Georgia, year by year

Annual values for 2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Georgia, 2001 to 2023.
Year % Change
2001 6.6 %
2002 5 % -24.2%
2003 4.3 % -14.0%
2004 4.3 % +0.0%
2005 4.8 % +11.6%
2006 5.3 % +10.4%
2007 5.9 % +11.3%
2008 6.7 % +13.6%
2009 7.9 % +17.9%
2010 8.6 % +8.9%
2011 8.8 % +2.3%
2012 8.3 % -5.7%
2013 7.9 % -4.8%
2014 7.4 % -6.3%
2015 7.4 % +0.0%
2016 7.1 % -4.1%
2017 6.6 % -7.0%
2018 5.4 % -18.2%
2019 5.6 % +3.7%
2020 5.5 % -1.8%
2021 5.4 % -1.8%
2022 3.8 % -29.6%
2023 2.7 % -28.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 5.64 % 4.3 % 7.9 % 9
2010s 7.31 % 5.4 % 8.8 % 10
2020s 4.35 % 2.7 % 5.5 % 4

Countries ranked near Georgia

  1. 96 Argentina 2.8 % compare
  2. 96 Dominican Republic 2.8 % compare
  3. 96 Tunisia 2.8 % compare
  4. 99 Brazil 2.7 % compare
  5. 99 Croatia 2.7 % compare
  6. 99 Malaysia 2.7 % compare
  7. 99 Saudi Arabia 2.7 % compare
  8. 99 Seychelles 2.7 % compare

See the full ranking of 158 places →

More economy & growth data for Georgia

All data for Georgia →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value in Georgia?
2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value in Georgia was 2.7 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value recorded in Georgia?
The highest recorded value was 8.8 % in 2011.
What is the lowest 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value recorded in Georgia?
The lowest recorded value was 2.7 % in 2023.
How does Georgia rank for 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value?
Georgia ranks 99th out of 115 countries with data for 2023.
Is 2.1.1 prevalence of undernourishment — value rising or falling in Georgia?
Over the last ten years it is down 65.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Georgia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Georgia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-1-1-prevalence-of-undernourishment-value/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-1-1-prevalence-of-undernourishment-value/georgia/">2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value in Georgia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
158 places, 3,513 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.