Sierra Leone vs Uganda: Vulnerability score, Food
Vulnerability score, Food over time
- Sierra Leone
- Uganda
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 0.6225 against 0.6223 in Uganda, a difference of 0.0002.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Uganda ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 19th and Uganda ranks 20th of 189 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6162 | 0.6373 | 0.021 | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0.6229 | 0.6284 | 0.0055 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, food, Sierra Leone or Uganda?
- Sierra Leone, at 0.6225 against 0.6223 in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, food between Sierra Leone and Uganda?
- 0.0002, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Uganda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Sierra Leone and Uganda rank globally for vulnerability score, food?
- Sierra Leone ranks 19th and Uganda ranks 20th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.