Cyprus vs Greece: Vulnerability score, Food
Vulnerability score, Food over time
- Cyprus
- Greece
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0.3257 against 0.3239 in Greece, a difference of 0.0018.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Greece ahead.
Cyprus ranks 152nd and Greece ranks 153rd of 189 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Greece in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3132 | 0.3334 | 0.0202 | Greece |
| 2020s | 0.324 | 0.3189 | 0.0051 | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, food, Cyprus or Greece?
- Cyprus, at 0.3257 against 0.3239 in Greece as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, food between Cyprus and Greece?
- 0.0018, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Greece?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Greece rank globally for vulnerability score, food?
- Cyprus ranks 152nd and Greece ranks 153rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.