Cuba vs Tanzania: Vulnerability score, Exposure
Vulnerability score, Exposure over time
- Cuba
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 0.4992 against 0.4974 in Cuba, a difference of 0.0018.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 41st and Tanzania ranks 40th of 192 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4974 | 0.4992 | 0.0018 | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 0.4974 | 0.4992 | 0.0018 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, exposure, Cuba or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 0.4992 against 0.4974 in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, exposure between Cuba and Tanzania?
- 0.0018, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tanzania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Tanzania rank globally for vulnerability score, exposure?
- Cuba ranks 41st and Tanzania ranks 40th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Exposure. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.