Estonia vs Georgia: Vulnerability score, Ecosystems
Vulnerability score, Ecosystems over time
- Estonia
- Georgia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.4941 against 0.4924 in Georgia, a difference of 0.0017.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Georgia ahead.
Estonia ranks 64th and Georgia ranks 65th of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4868 | 0.4881 | 0.0013 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.494 | 0.4914 | 0.0027 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, ecosystems, Estonia or Georgia?
- Estonia, at 0.4941 against 0.4924 in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, ecosystems between Estonia and Georgia?
- 0.0017, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Georgia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Georgia rank globally for vulnerability score, ecosystems?
- Estonia ranks 64th and Georgia ranks 65th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Ecosystems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.