Comoros vs Togo: Vegetable consumption per capita
Comoros
44.56 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Togo
43.02 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Comoros rank
149th
Togo rank
152nd
Vegetable consumption per capita over time
- Comoros
- Togo
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 44.56 kilograms per year per capita against 43.02 kilograms per year per capita in Togo, a difference of 1.54 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Togo ahead.
Comoros ranks 149th and Togo ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.94 kilograms per year per capita | 40.82 kilograms per year per capita | 19.88 kilograms per year per capita | Togo |
| 2020s | 43.79 kilograms per year per capita | 44.55 kilograms per year per capita | 0.7541 kilograms per year per capita | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vegetable consumption per capita, Comoros or Togo?
- Comoros, at 44.56 kilograms per year per capita against 43.02 kilograms per year per capita in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in vegetable consumption per capita between Comoros and Togo?
- 1.54 kilograms per year per capita, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Togo?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Comoros and Togo rank globally for vegetable consumption per capita?
- Comoros ranks 149th and Togo ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Vegetable consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.