Japan vs Latvia: Trade in employment (TiM) 2021 edition — Domestic employment embodied
Trade in employment (TiM) 2021 edition — Domestic employment embodied over time
- Japan
- Latvia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 174.6 Persons against 2.2 Persons in Latvia, a difference of 172.4 Persons.
That makes Japan's figure about 79.4 times Latvia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 13th and Latvia ranks 11th of 40 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 123.78 Persons | 2.36 Persons | 121.42 Persons | Japan |
| 2000s | 126.33 Persons | 2.33 Persons | 124 Persons | Japan |
| 2010s | 194.99 Persons | 2.29 Persons | 192.7 Persons | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade in employment (tim) 2021 edition — domestic employment embodied, Japan or Latvia?
- Japan, at 174.6 Persons against 2.2 Persons in Latvia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in trade in employment (tim) 2021 edition — domestic employment embodied between Japan and Latvia?
- 172.4 Persons, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2018.
- How do Japan and Latvia rank globally for trade in employment (tim) 2021 edition — domestic employment embodied?
- Japan ranks 13th and Latvia ranks 11th of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Trade in employment (TiM) 2021 edition — Domestic employment embodied in foreign final demand. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Trade in employment (TiM) database, see TiM web page, is a collection of labour market indicators designed to provide additional insights into global production networks and supply chains, and complement Trade in Value Added (TiVA) indicators, see TiVA web page. Estimates of employment or compensation of employees embodied in foreign final demand (or in gross exports) can reveal the extent to which a country's workforce depends on its integration into the global economy. TiM indicators are based on employment and compensation of employees for more than 50 economies (including all EU, OECD, G20, and most East and Southeast Asian economies), as well as region aggregates. TiM is estimated using the 2021 edition of the OECD's Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables, see ICIO web page, together with recent estimates of employment and of employees' compensation by industrial activity from official sources. Series are available for 1995-2018 and broken down in 45 individual industries based on ISIC Rev.4. • TiM structure (old versus new codes) • Documentation • Notes par pays Contact icio-tiva.contact@oecd.org.