Canada vs Japan: Trade in employment (TiM) 2021 edition — Domestic employment embodied

Canada
81 Persons
in 2018
Japan
174.6 Persons
in 2018
Canada rank
16th
Japan rank
13th

Trade in employment (TiM) 2021 edition — Domestic employment embodied over time

  • Canada
  • Japan
50100150200250199520062018

How they compare

Japan currently reports 174.6 Persons against 81 Persons in Canada, a difference of 93.6 Persons.

That makes Japan's figure about 2.2 times Canada's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 16th and Japan ranks 13th of 40 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Japan Difference Ahead
1990s 71.02 Persons 123.78 Persons 52.76 Persons Japan
2000s 55.65 Persons 126.33 Persons 70.68 Persons Japan
2010s 84.12 Persons 194.99 Persons 110.87 Persons Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trade in employment (tim) 2021 edition — domestic employment embodied, Canada or Japan?
Japan, at 174.6 Persons against 81 Persons in Canada as of 2018.
What is the difference in trade in employment (tim) 2021 edition — domestic employment embodied between Canada and Japan?
93.6 Persons, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Japan?
24 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2018.
How do Canada and Japan rank globally for trade in employment (tim) 2021 edition — domestic employment embodied?
Canada ranks 16th and Japan ranks 13th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Trade in employment (TiM) 2021 edition — Domestic employment embodied in foreign final demand. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Japan: Trade in employment (TiM) 2021 edition — Domestic employment embodied. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/trade-in-employment-tim-2021-edition-domestic-employment-embodied-in-foreign-final-demand/canada/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/trade-in-employment-tim-2021-edition-domestic-employment-embodied-in-foreign-final-demand/canada/japan/">Canada vs Japan: Trade in employment (TiM) 2021 edition — Domestic employment embodied</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trade in employment (TiM) 2021 edition — Domestic employment embodied in foreign final demand
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
60 places, 1,440 data points, 1995–2018
Last refreshed

The Trade in employment (TiM) database, see TiM web page, is a collection of labour market indicators designed to provide additional insights into global production networks and supply chains, and complement Trade in Value Added (TiVA) indicators, see TiVA web page. Estimates of employment or compensation of employees embodied in foreign final demand (or in gross exports) can reveal the extent to which a country's workforce depends on its integration into the global economy. TiM indicators are based on employment and compensation of employees for more than 50 economies (including all EU, OECD, G20, and most East and Southeast Asian economies), as well as region aggregates. TiM is estimated using the 2021 edition of the OECD's Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables, see ICIO web page, together with recent estimates of employment and of employees' compensation by industrial activity from official sources. Series are available for 1995-2018 and broken down in 45 individual industries based on ISIC Rev.4. • TiM structure (old versus new codes) • Documentation • Notes par pays Contact icio-tiva.contact@oecd.org.