How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Portugal?

34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Namibia vs Portugal: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP

Namibia

0.2059 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Portugal

0.1986 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Namibia rank

77th

Portugal rank

79th

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

Namibia
Portugal

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.2059 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1986 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Portugal, a difference of 0.0073 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.

Namibia ranks 77th and Portugal ranks 79th of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and Portugal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Namibia	Portugal	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0527 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1876 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.135 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Portugal
2000s	0.0927 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0772 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0155 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Namibia
2010s	0.1474 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0984 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.049 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Namibia
2020s	0.2232 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1392 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0839 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp, Namibia or Portugal?: Namibia, at 0.2059 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1986 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Portugal as of 2025.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp between Namibia and Portugal?: 0.0073 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Portugal?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Namibia and Portugal rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp?: Namibia ranks 77th and Portugal ranks 79th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Portugal: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/portugal/">Namibia vs Portugal: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 182 places, 9,273 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.