How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?

34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Namibia: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP

Iceland

0.2004 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Namibia

0.2059 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Iceland rank

78th

Namibia rank

77th

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

Iceland
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.2059 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2004 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Iceland, a difference of 0.0055 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 78th and Namibia ranks 77th of 181 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0562 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0527 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0035 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2000s	0.1088 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0927 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0161 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2010s	0.3142 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1474 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1668 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2020s	0.2233 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2232 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0001 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp, Iceland or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.2059 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2004 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Iceland as of 2025.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp between Iceland and Namibia?: 0.0055 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp?: Iceland ranks 78th and Namibia ranks 77th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 182 places, 9,273 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.