China vs Portugal: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP

China
0.1923 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Portugal
0.1986 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
China rank
80th
Portugal rank
79th

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • China
  • Portugal
00.10.20.30.40.5196019922025

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.1986 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1923 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0.0063 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Portugal ahead.

China ranks 80th and Portugal ranks 79th of 181 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Portugal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Portugal Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0346 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3044 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2698 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP Portugal
1980s 0.0688 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2913 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2225 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP Portugal
1990s 0.1124 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2057 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0933 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP Portugal
2000s 0.3133 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0772 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.236 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP China
2010s 0.3325 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0984 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.234 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP China
2020s 0.1931 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1392 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0538 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp, China or Portugal?
Portugal, at 0.1986 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1923 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp between China and Portugal?
0.0063 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Portugal?
49 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2025.
How do China and Portugal rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp?
China ranks 80th and Portugal ranks 79th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Portugal: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/portugal/">China vs Portugal: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 9,273 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.