How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Lithuania?

30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Lithuania: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP

Chad

0.0777 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Lithuania

0.0741 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Chad rank

140th

Lithuania rank

143rd

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

Chad
Lithuania

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0777 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0741 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0036 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.

Chad ranks 140th and Lithuania ranks 143rd of 181 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0862 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1104 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0242 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Lithuania
2000s	0.072 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1608 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0888 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Lithuania
2010s	0.0349 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1318 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0969 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Lithuania
2020s	0.0461 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0814 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0353 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp, Chad or Lithuania?: Chad, at 0.0777 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0741 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp between Chad and Lithuania?: 0.0036 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Lithuania?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Chad and Lithuania rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp?: Chad ranks 140th and Lithuania ranks 143rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Lithuania: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/lithuania/">Chad vs Lithuania: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 182 places, 9,273 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.