How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nigeria?

32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Nigeria: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP

Belarus

0.1555 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Nigeria

0.1583 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Belarus rank

103rd

Nigeria rank

101st

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

Belarus
Nigeria

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0.1583 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1555 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0.0028 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Nigeria ahead.

Belarus ranks 103rd and Nigeria ranks 101st of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Nigeria	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0274 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0373 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0099 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Nigeria
2000s	0.0514 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1401 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0887 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Nigeria
2010s	0.1066 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0812 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0254 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Belarus
2020s	0.1218 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.096 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0258 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp, Belarus or Nigeria?: Nigeria, at 0.1583 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1555 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp between Belarus and Nigeria?: 0.0028 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nigeria?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Nigeria rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per unit of gdp?: Belarus ranks 103rd and Nigeria ranks 101st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Nigeria: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/nigeria/">Belarus vs Nigeria: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 182 places, 9,273 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.