Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita

Portugal
6,371 includes gold, current US$ per person
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
6,011 includes gold, current US$ per person
in 2025
Portugal rank
29th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
32nd

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita over time

  • Portugal
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196019922025

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 6,371 includes gold, current US$ per person against 6,011 includes gold, current US$ per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 360 includes gold, current US$ per person.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Portugal ahead.

Portugal ranks 29th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 32nd of 182 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 1,039 includes gold, current US$ per person 190.28 includes gold, current US$ per person 848.31 includes gold, current US$ per person Portugal
1990s 2,143 includes gold, current US$ per person 749.45 includes gold, current US$ per person 1,394 includes gold, current US$ per person Portugal
2000s 1,253 includes gold, current US$ per person 1,752 includes gold, current US$ per person 499.49 includes gold, current US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 2,136 includes gold, current US$ per person 6,393 includes gold, current US$ per person 4,257 includes gold, current US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 3,793 includes gold, current US$ per person 6,650 includes gold, current US$ per person 2,857 includes gold, current US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per capita, Portugal or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Portugal, at 6,371 includes gold, current US$ per person against 6,011 includes gold, current US$ per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per capita between Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
360 includes gold, current US$ per person, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
How do Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per capita?
Portugal ranks 29th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 32nd of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-capita/portugal/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-capita/portugal/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita
Unit
includes gold, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 9,516 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.