Ecuador vs India: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita

Ecuador
535.7 includes gold, current US$ per person
in 2025
India
478.24 includes gold, current US$ per person
in 2025
Ecuador rank
132nd
India rank
133rd

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • India
0200400600196019922025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 535.7 includes gold, current US$ per person against 478.24 includes gold, current US$ per person in India, a difference of 57.46 includes gold, current US$ per person.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times India's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 132nd and India ranks 133rd of 182 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and India in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador India Difference Ahead
1960s 10.02 includes gold, current US$ per person 1.34 includes gold, current US$ per person 8.68 includes gold, current US$ per person Ecuador
1970s 55.67 includes gold, current US$ per person 6.23 includes gold, current US$ per person 49.44 includes gold, current US$ per person Ecuador
1980s 85.1 includes gold, current US$ per person 12.33 includes gold, current US$ per person 72.78 includes gold, current US$ per person Ecuador
1990s 140.64 includes gold, current US$ per person 20.97 includes gold, current US$ per person 119.67 includes gold, current US$ per person Ecuador
2000s 155.28 includes gold, current US$ per person 130.72 includes gold, current US$ per person 24.56 includes gold, current US$ per person Ecuador
2010s 188.12 includes gold, current US$ per person 265.39 includes gold, current US$ per person 77.27 includes gold, current US$ per person India
2020s 415.4 includes gold, current US$ per person 438.04 includes gold, current US$ per person 22.64 includes gold, current US$ per person India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per capita, Ecuador or India?
Ecuador, at 535.7 includes gold, current US$ per person against 478.24 includes gold, current US$ per person in India as of 2025.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per capita between Ecuador and India?
57.46 includes gold, current US$ per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and India?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and India rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per capita?
Ecuador ranks 132nd and India ranks 133rd of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs India: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-capita/ecuador/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-capita/ecuador/india/">Ecuador vs India: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita
Unit
includes gold, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 9,516 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.