China, Macao SAR vs Estonia: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled over time
- China, Macao SAR
- Estonia
How they compare
China, Macao SAR currently reports 1,607 million USD against 1,492 million USD in Estonia, a difference of 115 million USD.
That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Estonia ahead.
China, Macao SAR ranks 45th and Estonia ranks 46th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Macao SAR | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.73 million USD | 737.56 million USD | 669.83 million USD | Estonia |
| 2010s | 280.51 million USD | 389.9 million USD | 109.39 million USD | Estonia |
| 2020s | 1,757 million USD | 486.73 million USD | 1,270 million USD | China, Macao SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled, China, Macao SAR or Estonia?
- China, Macao SAR, at 1,607 million USD against 1,492 million USD in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled between China, Macao SAR and Estonia?
- 115 million USD, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Estonia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do China, Macao SAR and Estonia rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled?
- China, Macao SAR ranks 45th and Estonia ranks 46th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$ with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.