Central America vs Denmark: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled over time
- Central America
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 13,542 million USD against 7,926 million USD in Central America, a difference of 5,616 million USD.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.7 times Central America's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Denmark ahead.
Central America ranks 19th and Denmark ranks 21st of 30 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central America averaged higher in 1 and Denmark in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 213.97 million USD | 4,239 million USD | 4,025 million USD | Denmark |
| 2000s | 4,527 million USD | 9,573 million USD | 5,046 million USD | Denmark |
| 2010s | 11,610 million USD | 8,184 million USD | 3,426 million USD | Central America |
| 2020s | 6,180 million USD | 13,647 million USD | 7,467 million USD | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled, Central America or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 13,542 million USD against 7,926 million USD in Central America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled between Central America and Denmark?
- 5,616 million USD, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Denmark?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Denmark rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled?
- Central America ranks 19th and Denmark ranks 21st of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$ with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.