Eswatini vs Uganda: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
18,723 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
18,593 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
122nd
Uganda rank
123rd

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Uganda
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 18,723 current US$ per square kilometre against 18,593 current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 130 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 122nd and Uganda ranks 123rd of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 215.86 current US$ per square kilometre 316.71 current US$ per square kilometre 100.85 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 2,173 current US$ per square kilometre 239.65 current US$ per square kilometre 1,933 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 5,072 current US$ per square kilometre 959.39 current US$ per square kilometre 4,113 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 12,906 current US$ per square kilometre 1,956 current US$ per square kilometre 10,950 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 6,465 current US$ per square kilometre 3,039 current US$ per square kilometre 3,425 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 15,375 current US$ per square kilometre 9,965 current US$ per square kilometre 5,410 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 19,160 current US$ per square kilometre 15,729 current US$ per square kilometre 3,432 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Uganda?
Eswatini, at 18,723 current US$ per square kilometre against 18,593 current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Uganda?
130 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Uganda rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 122nd and Uganda ranks 123rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Uganda: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/uganda/">Eswatini vs Uganda: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,863 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.