Eswatini vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
18,723 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
17,470 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
122nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
124th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 18,723 current US$ per square kilometre against 17,470 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 1,253 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 122nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 124th of 195 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 12,906 current US$ per square kilometre 532.54 current US$ per square kilometre 12,374 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 6,465 current US$ per square kilometre 1,498 current US$ per square kilometre 4,967 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 15,375 current US$ per square kilometre 4,170 current US$ per square kilometre 11,205 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 19,160 current US$ per square kilometre 13,658 current US$ per square kilometre 5,503 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Eswatini, at 18,723 current US$ per square kilometre against 17,470 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1,253 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 122nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 124th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tanzania/">Eswatini vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,863 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.