Egypt vs Eswatini: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre

Egypt
19,952 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
18,723 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
121st
Eswatini rank
122nd

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Egypt
  • Eswatini
-10.0k010.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 19,952 current US$ per square kilometre against 18,723 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 1,229 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 121st and Eswatini ranks 122nd of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 609.74 current US$ per square kilometre 215.86 current US$ per square kilometre 393.88 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 971.36 current US$ per square kilometre 2,173 current US$ per square kilometre 1,201 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 1,704 current US$ per square kilometre 5,072 current US$ per square kilometre 3,369 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 3,897 current US$ per square kilometre 12,906 current US$ per square kilometre 9,009 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 6,361 current US$ per square kilometre 6,465 current US$ per square kilometre 103.38 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 1,189 current US$ per square kilometre 15,375 current US$ per square kilometre 14,186 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 20,372 current US$ per square kilometre 19,160 current US$ per square kilometre 1,212 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre, Egypt or Eswatini?
Egypt, at 19,952 current US$ per square kilometre against 18,723 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre between Egypt and Eswatini?
1,229 current US$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Eswatini rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre?
Egypt ranks 121st and Eswatini ranks 122nd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Eswatini: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/eswatini/">Egypt vs Eswatini: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,863 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.